Wednesday 20 February 2013

Bad at elaborating.


Now the Government of India has been hatching a plan in order to replenish its coffers and to curtail the fiscal deficit. The plan is to prevent the country’s growth from pruning by incrementing taxes on the rich people. The plot is a good one which will aim at obliterating the gaps between the rich and poor and the money in form of tax collected from rich people can be used in accommodating subsidies to the impoverished and paupers.

But let me tell you something which is very perilous for the people. You would be thinking that our government is out of order at many other things but in terms of elaboration of something. Its ridiculous; but it is not, this one is an accepted and authentic fact and I am having sustainable evidence to prove that I am right.

If a government can proclaim that people earning ₹32 a day in urban area in such a high inflation rate where even people getting  remuneration of ₹25000 a month have to tackle a lot of hindrances and obstacles in their daily life and the government say that a person earning 960 a month is not a poor man. Isn’t that completely reprehensible. It definitely is.

The government in this plan(tax on rich people) also needs to strive a lot and because it’s a very huge project has to diminish its discrepancies. I am having a question for the government in this context.

For a person who sleeps on footpath, a person having house would be richer, for a person having a house, a person having car would be richer, for a person having car, his manager would be richer and the story will go on without bearing any end.

 

So the government now has a need to first emend its definition of a poor man, otherwise everyone would be richer. India observed an immense depreciation in the number of poor people in the country, this was not due to country’s economic growth, this was because of extenuating the bar of poverty line, so if the government wants to diminish number of poor people in the country, then the country is definitely going to demote. First amend the way, you people describe the poverty and then should see who is poor and who is not.

No comments:

Post a Comment